Allegations of a Planned Digital Character Assassination of Navneet Sehgal
Former IAS Officer’s Credibility Targeted Through Social Media Narratives
Lucknow: Navneet Kumar Sehgal, former IAS officer and ex-Chairman of Prasar Bharati, has suddenly found himself at the center of an intense social media storm. This scrutiny did not begin with any official probe or government notice. Instead, it emerged on social media platform X, where selective narratives started circulating soon after his resignation.
Supporters claim this episode reflects a Navneet Sehgal digital character assassination, carried out through coordinated online messaging rather than formal processes.
Resignation Followed by a Sudden Narrative Shift
On December 2, 2025, Navneet Sehgal resigned from his position. Soon after, a series of posts began shaping a sharp narrative around his role and credibility. According to supporters, this shift was not organic.
Instead, they argue that a planned attempt was made to influence public opinion. As a result, criticism quickly moved beyond routine debate and began to resemble a sustained digital campaign.
Claims of a Coordinated Political Strategy
Supporters allege that the campaign forms part of a larger political strategy. They believe it coincided with discussions around key administrative reshuffles. Moreover, sources suggest that certain lobbying groups from Delhi and Uttar Pradesh amplified the messaging.
Political analysts say this issue goes beyond one individual. Rather, it reflects a wider struggle over influence, appointments, and control. In this context, Navneet Sehgal digital character assassination is being seen as a tool to curb future prospects.
Role of Social Media in Shaping Perception
Social media, many argue, has become a powerful court of public opinion. First, doubt is created. Then, credibility is questioned. Finally, opportunities are quietly closed.
Supporters claim that a handful of influential accounts repeatedly shared selective information. Because of this repetition, suspicion grew fast. Meanwhile, critics counter that public figures must face scrutiny in a democracy.
However, even critics admit that the timing and tone of these posts raise serious questions.
Journalistic Posts Add Fuel to the Debate
The debate intensified after posts appeared on X by senior journalists Swati Chaturvedi and Ravish Kumar. Following these posts, discussions gained speed and scale.
Now, many observers feel that this goes beyond criticism. Instead, it appears to be an effort to shape a political narrative through digital means.
No Official Response Yet, Questions Remain
So far, no official statement has come from the government. Still, the controversy continues to grow. Importantly, it now highlights a deeper issue.
Is social media becoming the final gatekeeper for public appointments? And can a Navneet Sehgal digital character assassination redefine how reputations are built or broken?
A Larger Battle Between Power, Media, and Platforms
Ultimately, this case is not just about one former official. It signals a changing power dynamic. Politics, media, and social platforms now intersect more than ever.
As this episode unfolds, one question stands out. Will future careers be decided by due process, or by the loudest voices online?
Also Read : Power Changed, Credibility Remained: The Enduring Administrative Model of Navneet Kumar Sehgal
